Sunday, August 26, 2012

NYPD confirms: All bystanders in Empire State attack hit by police bullets

Officials in New York City defend police officers use of deadly force, as seen on graphic video, to stop gunman Jeffrey Johnson outside the Empire State Building. Nine bystanders were injured. NBC's Lester Holt reports.

?

By Tom Hays and Verena Dobnik, NBCNewYork.com

All nine people wounded during a dramatic confrontation between police and a gunman outside the Empire State Building were struck by bullets fired by the two officers, police said Saturday, citing ballistics evidence.

The veteran patrolmen who opened fire on the suit-wearing gunman, Jeffrey Johnson, had only an instant to react when he whirled and pointed a .45-caliber pistol as they approached him from behind on a busy sidewalk.

Officer Craig Matthews shot seven times. Officer Robert Sinishtaj fired nine times, police said. Neither had ever fired their weapons before on a patrol.


More from NBCNewYork.com

The volley of gunfire felled Johnson in just a few seconds and left nine other people bleeding on the sidewalk.

In the initial chaos Friday, it wasn't clear whether Johnson or the officers were responsible for the trail of wounded, but based on ballistic and other evidence, "it appears that all nine of the victims were struck either by fragments or by bullets fired by police," Police Commissioner Raymond Kelly told reporters on Saturday at a community event in Harlem.

Surveillance video shows what transpired Friday when gunman Jeffrey Johnson drew his weapon and opened fire on police on a street packed with pedestrians in midtown Manhattan. Who was Johnson and what possibly caused him to become violent?

He reiterated that the officers appeared to have no choice but to shoot Johnson, whose body had 10 bullet wounds in the chest, arms and legs.

"I believe it was handled well," Kelly said.

The officers confronted Johnson as he walked, casually, down the street after gunning down a former co-worker on the sidewalk outside the office they once shared. The shooting happened at 9 a.m., as the neighborhood bustled with people arriving for work.

'Look of death': Co-workers tell of office feud

The gunman and his victim, Steve Ercolino, had a history of workplace squabbles before Johnson was laid off from their company, Hazan Import Corp., a year ago. At one point, the two men had grappled physically in an elevator.

John Koch, the property manager at the office building where the men worked, said security camera footage showed the two pushing and shoving. The tussle ended when Ercolino, a much larger man, pinned Johnson against the wall of the elevator by the throat, Koch said. Ercolino let him go after a few moments, and the two men went their separate ways.

"They didn't like each other," Koch said.

On Friday, Johnson shot Ercolino five times in the head and face, a medical examiner's spokeswoman said. After the shooting, Johnson, an eccentric T-shirt designer and avid bird-watcher who wore a suit every day, even when photographing hawks in Central Park, walked away as if nothing had happened.

Watch US News crime videos on NBCNews.com?

Alerted by a construction worker, Officers Matthews and Sinishtaj gave chase as Johnson rounded a corner and walked along Fifth Avenue, in front of the landmark skyscraper.

A security videotape from the scene shows several civilians ? including three sitting on a bench only a few feet away ? scattering as the officers opened fire.

Police have determined that three people were struck by whole bullets ? two of which were removed from victims at the hospital ? and the rest were grazed "by fragments of some sort," Kelly said.

Three people remained hospitalized, all in stable condition, police said.

Both Matthews, 39, and Sinishtaj, 40, joined the nation's largest police department 15 years ago.

Matthews had drawn attention earlier this year by filing a lawsuit against the New York Police Department that accused his superiors of unfairly punishing him for not meeting arrest quotas. A judge threw out the complaint.

There was no immediate response to a message left with the union representing the two officers.

Stay informed with the latest headlines; sign up for our newsletter?

The shooting didn't deter tourists from flocking to the Empire State Building as usual on Saturday.

Patricia Flynn, 57, a retired schoolteacher, visited the building's peak with her elderly mother, who once worked in the skyscraper as a secretary.

"But I didn't tell her what happened," said Flynn, adding that her mother was unaware of Friday's shooting. "And she really enjoyed the view."

A group of 31 tourists from all over France held a meeting Friday night at their nearby hotel to decide whether to cancel their planned Empire State Building visit.

"We were scared, and we thought it was a risk," said Catherine Krukar, 38, a teacher.

But in the end, they went ahead with the visit, she said after descending from the observation tower,

"We know it can happen anywhere, and we wanted to see the Empire State Building," Krukar said. "It was beautiful!

WNBC's Jonathan Dienst contributed to this report.

More content from NBCNews.com:

Follow US News from NBCNews.com on Twitter and Facebook

Source: http://usnews.nbcnews.com/_news/2012/08/25/13478324-nypd-confirms-all-bystanders-in-empire-state-attack-hit-by-police-bullets?lite

bill of rights toys r us toys r us shame shame the waltons the waltons

Non-smokers benefit most from smoking ban

ScienceDaily (Aug. 25, 2012) ? Many European countries have passed anti-smoking legislation which bans smoking from restaurants, bars and public buildings. After implementation of such a smoking ban on 1 January 2008 in the metropolitan area of Bremen in northwest Germany (800,000 inhabitants) a 16% decline in ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) was observed. STEMI is the severest form of myocardial infarction.

For the study, 3,545 STEMIs in the Bremen-STEMI-Registry which occurred between 2006 and 2010 were analyzed.? Dr Schmucker said: "There were more non-smokers than smokers, which explains why the non-smokers group had more STEMIs registered."

For the total population in 2006 and 2007, before the smoking ban was passed, averages of 65 STEMIs were registered per month. In 2008 to 2010, after the smoking ban was passed, the number fell by 16% to an average of 55 STEMIs per month. "This confirms that the smoking ban had a positive impact on the population as a whole by decreasing the number of STEMIs," said Dr Schmucker.

A nearly constant rate of STEMIs was observed in active smokers during 2006-2010. In 2006-2007 active smokers had an average of 25 STEMIs per month. In 2008-2010, they had an average of 26 STEMIs per month, a 4% increase. Dr Schmucker said: "Active smokers are inhaling such high doses of tobacco smoke that being exposed to less passive smoke in public venues is not going to change the risk for that particular group."

In non-smokers there was a 26% decrease in STEMIs, from an average of 39 STEMIs per month in 2006-2007 to an average of 29 STEMIs per month in 2008-2010. The steepest decline in the non-smoking group was detected in young non-smokers; in this group the average number of STEMIs per month was 31% lower in 2008-2010 compared to 2006-2007.

"The reduction in the occurrence of this severest and deadliest form of myocardial infarction in the metropolitan area of Bremen can be partially attributed to the commencement of anti-smoking legislation," said Dr Schmucker. "Non-smokers and especially non-smokers under the age of 65 benefited most from the implementation of the law, indicating the harmful effects of passive smoking. This suggests that expanding anti-smoking legislation could reduce the occurrence of STEMIs even further in the future."

Share this story on Facebook, Twitter, and Google:

Other social bookmarking and sharing tools:


Story Source:

The above story is reprinted from materials provided by European Society of Cardiology (ESC).

Note: Materials may be edited for content and length. For further information, please contact the source cited above.


Note: If no author is given, the source is cited instead.

Disclaimer: This article is not intended to provide medical advice, diagnosis or treatment. Views expressed here do not necessarily reflect those of ScienceDaily or its staff.

Source: http://feeds.sciencedaily.com/~r/sciencedaily/~3/W9Aqj8dwZD4/120825155652.htm

james harrison falcons giants game norman borlaug santorum new hampshire debate rupaul

Saturday, August 25, 2012

Romney turns to Ohio amidst distractions

POWELL, Ohio (AP) ? Mitt Romney and running mate Paul Ryan are telling Ohio voters that President Barack Obama still doesn't have any idea how to salvage the tough economy he inherited.

The Republican duo campaigned near Columbus on Saturday as Obama launched a new line of criticism about what they would do to Medicare. Outside the rally, protesters heckled the presumptive GOP ticket about their plans for seniors' health care.

Ryan says one in six Americans is living in poverty. He says the country is done being fooled by Obama's promises to change Washington.

The rally is expected to be Romney's last public appearance before the Republican National Convention opens next week in Tampa, Fla.

Source: http://news.yahoo.com/romney-turns-ohio-amidst-distractions-072025970.html

cinnamon challenge lou dobbs rock salt david letterman march of dimes james randi wargames

USADA to strip Lance Armstrong of 7 Tour titles

AUSTIN, Texas (AP) ? The U.S. Anti-Doping Agency said Thursday night it will strip Lance Armstrong of his unprecedented seven Tour de France titles after he declared he was finished fighting the drug charges that threaten his legacy as one of the greatest cyclists of all time.

Travis Tygart, USADA's chief executive, said Armstrong would also be hit with a lifetime ban on Friday.

Still to be heard from was the sport's governing body, the International Cycling Union, which had backed Armstrong's legal challenge to USADA's authority.

Armstrong, who retired last year, declined to enter USADA's arbitration process ? his last option ? because he said he was weary of fighting accusations that have dogged him for years. He has consistently pointed to the hundreds of drug tests that he has passed as proof of his innocence during his extraordinary run of Tour titles stretchingfrom1999-2005.

"There comes a point in every man's life when he has to say, "Enough is enough." For me, that time is now," Armstrong said in a statement sent to The Associated Press. He called the USADA investigation an "unconstitutional witch hunt."

"I have been dealing with claims that I cheated and had an unfair advantage in winning my seven Tours since 1999," he said. "The toll this has taken on my family and my work for our foundation and on me leads me to where I am today - finished with this nonsense."

USADA reacted quickly and treated Armstrong's decision as an admission of guilt, hanging the label of drug cheat on an athlete who was a hero to thousands for overcoming life-threatening testicular cancer and for his foundation's support for cancer research.

"It is a sad day for all of us who love sport and athletes," Tygart said. "It's a heartbreaking example of win at all costs overtaking the fair and safe option. There's no success in cheating to win."

Tygart said the agency can strip the Tour titles, though Armstrong disputed that as he insisted his decision is not an admission of drug use, but a refusal to enter an arbitration process he believes is unfair.

"USADA cannot assert control of a professional international sport and attempt to strip my seven Tour de France titles," he said. "I know who won those seven Tours, my teammates know who won those seven Tours, and everyone I competed against knows who won those seven Tours."

USADA maintains that Armstrong has used banned substances as far back as 1996, including the blood-booster EPO and steroids as well as blood transfusions ? all to boost his performance.

The 40-year-old Armstrong walked away from the sport in 2011 without being charged following a two-year federal criminal investigation into many of the same accusations he faces from USADA. The federal probe was closed in February, but USADA announced in June it had evidence Armstrong used banned substances and methods ? and encouraged their use by teammates. The agency also said it had blood tests from 2009 and 2010 that were "fully consistent" with blood doping.

Included in USADA's evidence were emails written by Armstrong's former U.S. Postal Service teammate Floyd Landis, who was stripped of his 2006 Tour de France title after a positive drug test. Landis' emails to a USA Cycling official detailed allegations of a complex doping program on the team.

USADA also said it had 10 former Armstrong teammates ready to testify against him. Other than suggesting they include Landis and Tyler Hamilton, both of whom have admitted to doping offenses, the agency has refused to say who they are or specifically what they would say.

"There is zero physical evidence to support (the) outlandish and heinous claims. The only physical evidence here is the hundreds of (doping) controls I have passed with flying colors," Armstrong said.

Armstrong sued USADA in Austin, where he lives, in an attempt to block the case and was supported by the UCI. A judge threw out the case on Monday, siding with USADA despite questioning the agency's pursuit of Armstrong in his retirement.

"USADA's conduct raises serious questions about whether its real interest in charging Armstrong is to combat doping, or if it is acting according to less noble motives," such as politics or publicity, U.S. District Judge Sam Sparks wrote.

Now the ultra-competitive Armstrong has done something virtually unthinkable for him: He has quit before a fight is over.

"Today I turn the page. I will no longer address this issue, regardless of the circumstances. I will commit myself to the work I began before ever winning a single Tour de France title: serving people and families affected by cancer, especially those in underserved communities," Armstrong said.

Armstrong could have pressed his innocence in USADA's arbitration process, but the cyclist has said he believes most people have already made up their minds about whether he's a fraud or a persecuted hero.

It was a stunning move for an athlete who built his reputation on not only beating cancer, but forcing himself through grueling offseason workouts no one else could match, then crushing his rivals in the Alps and the Pyrenees.

Although he had already been crowned a world champion and won individual stages at the Tour de France, Armstrong was still relatively unknown in the U.S. until he won the epic race for the first time in 1999. It was the ultimate comeback tale: When diagnosed with cancer, doctors had given him less than a 50 percent chance of survival before surgery and brutal cycles of chemotherapy saved his life.

Armstrong's riveting victories, his work for cancer awareness and his gossip-page romances with rocker Sheryl Crow, fashion designer Tory Burch and actress Kate Hudson made him a figure who transcended sports.

His dominance of the Tour de France elevated the sport's popularity in America to unprecedented levels. His story and success helped sell millions of the "Livestrong" plastic yellow wrist bracelets, and enabled him to enlist lawmakers and global policymakers to promote cancer awareness and research. His Lance Armstrong Foundation has raised nearly $500 million since its founding in 1997.

Created in 2000, USADA is recognized by Congress as the official anti-doping agency for Olympic sports in the United States. Its investigators joined U.S. agents during the federal probe, and Tygart had dismissed Armstrong's lawsuit as an attempt at "concealing the truth." He said the agency is motivated by one goal ? exposing cheaters in sport.

Others close to Armstrong were caught up in the charges: Johan Bruyneel, the coach of Armstrong's teams, and three members of the medical staff and a consultant were also charged. Bruyneel is taking his case to arbitration, while two medical team staffers and consulting doctor Michele Ferrari didn't formally contest the charges and were issued lifetime ban by USADA. Ferrari later said he was innocent.

In a sport rife with cheaters, Armstrong has been under constant suspicion since the 1990s from those who refused to believe he was a clean rider winning cycling's premier event against a field of doped-up competition.

He had tense public disputes with USADA, the World Anti-Doping Agency, some former teammates and assistants and even Greg LeMond, the first American to win the Tour de France.

Through it all, Armstrong vigorously denied any and all hints, rumors and direct accusations he was cheating. He had the blazing personality, celebrity and personal wealth needed to fight back with legal and public relations battles to clear his name ? and he did, time after time.

Armstrong won his first Tour at a time when doping scandals had rocked the race. He was leading the race when a trace amount of a banned anti-inflammatory corticosteroid was found in his urine; cycling officials said he was authorized to use a small amount of a cream to treat saddle sores.

After Armstrong's second victory in 2000, French judicial officials investigated his Postal Service team for drug use. That investigation ended with no charges, but the allegations kept coming.

Armstrong was criticized for his relationship with Ferrari, who was banned by Italian authorities over doping charges in 2002. Former personal and team assistants accused Armstrong of having steroids in an apartment in Spain and disposing of syringes that were used for injections.

In 2004, a Dallas-based promotions company initially refused to pay him a $5 million bonus for winning his sixth Tour de France because it wanted to investigate allegations raised by media in Europe. Testimony in that case included former teammate Frankie Andreu and his wife, Betsy, saying Armstrong told doctors during his 1996 cancer treatments that he had taken a cornucopia of steroids and performance-enhancing drugs.

Two books published in Europe, "L.A. Confidential" and "L.A. Official," also raised doping allegations and, in 2005, French magazine L'Equipe reported that retested urine samples from the 1999 Tour showed EPO use.

Armstrong fought every accusation with denials and, in some cases, lawsuits against the European media outlets that reported them.

But he showed signs that he was tiring of the never-ending questions. Armstrong retired (for the first time) in 2005 and almost immediately considered a comeback before deciding to stay on the sidelines, in part, because he didn't want to keep answering doping questions.

"I'm sick of this," Armstrong said in 2005. "Sitting here today, dealing with all this stuff again, knowing if I were to go back, there's no way I could get a fair shake ? on the roadside, in doping control, or the labs."

Three years later, Armstrong was 36 and itching to ride again. He came back to finish third in the 2009 Tour de France.

Armstrong raced in the Tour again in 2010, under the cloud of the federal criminal investigation. Early last year, he quit the sport for good, but made a brief return as a triathlete until the USADA investigation shut him down.

During his sworn testimony in the dispute over the $5 million bonus, Armstrong said he wouldn't take performance enhancing drugs because he had too much to lose.

"(The) faith of all the cancer survivors around the world. Everything I do off the bike would go away, too," Armstrong said then. "And don't think for a second I don't understand that. It's not about money for me. Everything. It's also about the faith that people have put in me over the years. So all of that would be erased."

Source: http://news.yahoo.com/usada-strip-lance-armstrong-7-tour-titles-031949504--spt.html

pee wee herman ketamine tracy morgan ground hogs day 2012 goundhog day punxsutawney facebook ipo

How To Eliminate Acne breakouts ? What Is The Most suitable ...

A great deal of youngsters are usually afflicted with your skin ailment pimples during their teenager years and a multitude of older people end up having pimple as well. Most of these folks wish to learn how to eliminate acne of their skin places, their particular back and their boxes, the actual places that your skin is actually vulnerable to this condition. These types of places get several sebaceous boucle that rest underneath the epidermis within the subcutaneous part along with dissimul? material named sebum essential oil that may block up follicles as well as cause acne attacks. There are actually 3 crucial ways of the way to remove acne breakouts from your entire body.

1 extremely popular approach which usually most people try out initial is to utilize natural home remedies to be able to naturally solution the skin situation. How to take away acne the natural way in the home means understanding the underlying motives in the condition and various meals vegetation as well as medicinal herbal treatments will help very clear that. It might be important to identify just what not to try to eat or maybe placed on our bodies. All-natural healthy treatments hold the main gain seems to have actually affordable and straightforward to acquire. Herbal treatments carry out get more hours to operate as compared to chemical structured anti-acne lotions and creams.

Yet another famous technique of how you can take away acne is to make use of over-the-counter medications bought from your drug store or bought on the internet on the web. A number of people choose this method for you to dealing with their pimple as it is hassle-free, simple and comparatively affordable. Issue with this particular technique is that you have an array of anti-acne items open to pick from and a few of which do not work on almost all although some have got various results. Just before investing in a merchandise to help cure pimple someone ought to take some time performing research of what kind of substances inside event you seek out on the element product labels of such acne prescription drugs.

Another technique of how you can remove acne needs a stop by at an experienced professional medical care professional or even medical doctor to achieve the condition assessed. That is certainly, needless to say, an extremely more expensive way to do issues than the first two choices this means you will be frustrating along with trips for the medical professional going on for approximately 12 months. Individuals with strong sitting down cysts or specially intense acne breakouts could possibly look at this medical option so as to prevent virtually any lasting acne scarring from happening. Even the most unfortunate acne might be produced in check using modern dermatological engineering as well as health care techniques.

People ought to make sure that this diet actually having is healthy and it has incorporated into the idea a good amount of meals which contain antioxidants and Omega-3 fat. These kinds of foodstuffs include Green leafy vegetables, oily cold normal water sea food and wholegrain merchandise. The consumption of a nutritious diet along these lines provides the human body to be able to guard itself versus totally free radical compounds as well as harmful toxins that can damage your skin layer cellular levels as well as minimizes infection within pimples swellings. You will find only two essential things which remedies for pimple have to achieve. These are generally cleaning virtually any back logged follicles from the skin and harming the particular pimple leading to microorganisms contamination.

Watch Burn Notice Season 6 Episode 1 | Project Runway US Season 10 streaming

Source: http://all-articles-directory.com/how-to-eliminate-acne-breakouts-what-is-the-most-suitable-choice-to-suit-your-needs/

venus williams Freeh Report direct tv wimbledon ray allen Savages Home Run Derby 2012

Friday, August 24, 2012

St louis Roofers, Boyster Roofing - Significance Of Roofing

to Jeff A.

You should take roofing repairs and maintenance seriously if you wish to stay clear of unforeseen financial costs. Roofing is a crucial house improvement project and one that involves massive monetary investments. Given that most roofing projects involve good deal of cash, it is vital that you work with the proper service provider.

Choosing the best Roofing Contractor

Even though there are numerous roofing contractors that can fulfil your requirements, it's in your interest to select a professional roofing contractor. Qualified contractors are best prospects for the job mainly because they have many years of expertise in the discipline. When selecting a professional roofing contractor, be certain you check the service standard of the provider. There are numerous contractors who claim to be experts but they are not able to supply quick service due to the fact they don't have the essential work force. Great roofing contractors provide prompt and responsive emergency services to complete your specifications.

When selecting a roofing contractor, make sure their work force is skilled and qualified to complete the job. Specialist roofing contractors have qualified work force which can identify all kinds of challenges you're most likely to face in advance. Furthermore, the work given towards the contractor has to be fully guaranteed. If they do not give any kind of guarantee, they will not correct any roofing challenges that you detect right after they complete the work and then leave your property.

You have to also check if the roofing contractor is registered with under Construction Skills Certification Scheme or CSCS. Contractors which might be CSCS listed have construction expertise which might be necessary to complete the work. The roofing contractor you use must also hold a extensive insurance coverage plan. If the contractor holds a extensive insurance plan, it'll shield you and your property from monetary damage when people are injured. Complete insurance coverage policy will also guard you when third party property is broken when roofing repairs and also upkeep is done.

Benefits of Picking Professional Roofing Contractor

Although selecting the best roofing contractor may take time, you will be glad that you took time to pick the correct contractor when the project starts. In the event you select an unprofessional contractor, you will soon recognize the blunder you've committed. Instead of repenting for your errors, take your time in deciding on a professional roofing contractor who can complete the job with out any difficulty.

Picking an expert contractor for your roofing specifications will place your thoughts at ease. Even if the work will need quite a few months to complete, you will need not be concerned as you've chosen an expert to complete the job. Due to the fact qualified contractors have numerous years of expertise in the field, they are going to design roof that can enhance the energy efficiency of your house. Hiring an expert contractor will also support in improving the value of the home. Most new property owners choose buying homes which have new roof mainly because updating the roof is an high priced and time-consuming approach. For those who set up a new roof before you put your house for sale, you are probably to obtain a improved value for your property.

Written by Jeff, hope you like this post and here are 2 more that i have just currently read and liked St louis Roofers and Boyster Roofing.

This article has been viewed 16 time(s).

It is a violation of our terms and conditions for writers to submit material which they did not write and claim it as their own. If this article infringes on your copyrights, you MUST either call us at 706-866-2295 or send proof of infringement along with the offending article's title, URL, and writer name to

IdeaMarketers.com
Attn: Marnie Pehrson - Copyright Concern
514 Old Hickory Ln
Ringgold GA 30736 USA
If you email us or use our problem submission form, we CANNOT guarantee we'll receive your notice!

Source: http://www.ideamarketers.com/?articleid=3500549

whitney houston passed away heartbreak hotel don cornelius whitney houston i will always love you breaking news whitney houston carmen whitney houston last performance

Samsung teases ?Something Smart Is Coming? at IFA, possible Windows 8 device

";
document.write(gstring);
}
}


If you?re excited with the upcoming release of Microsoft?s latest platform, Windows 8, then you?re probably just as excited to see the sort of hardware the manufacturers might have up their sleeves to accompany the new operating system. Now it seems that Samsung does have something planned which they will be unveiling at IFA and have since released a video titled ?Something Smart Is Coming?. Thanks to the video, we have managed to catch a glimpse of what appears to be a laptop, although its full design and its specs were not revealed. However with IFA taking place very soon, we guess we won?t have to wait long to find out! In the meantime you can check out Samsung?s teaser video above.

Related articles:
Chrome for iOS updated
The Dark Pi Rises in the form of a drone
Pentagon lays down new social media rules

Seen at: global.samsungtomorrow??

Source: http://www.ubergizmo.com/2012/08/samsung-teases-something-smart-is-coming-at-ifa-possible-windows-8-device/

death race buffet rule carlos santana baa dodgers triple play samoyed kenny powers